A curate’s egg of a book

Moth is a fantasy world that has stopped turning, leaving half in permanent daylight and half in darkness. A very tiny world it must be, since it takes only a couple of hours to walk from the light side, through the bit of dusk, and into deep darkness. The people who live in the light don’t believe anybody lives in the dark and vice versa, even though a short walk would prove them wrong. There are so many unbelievable aspects to this idea that I read it as an allegory. However, by the time I got to the end, I realised that I was mistaken. The villain who looks like a serpent, the king clonking around in plate armour, the revolting peasants, the main characters who behave and speak like twelve year olds, the inexplicable demi-global crusade to destroy non-existant people in the dark world, are meant to be taken at face value. Seriously.

I had been going to write a review on the strength of the second part of the story set in the dark half, a Medieval Japanese style society. The heroine Koyee Mai I found touching and sympathetic, if you ignore the Taxi Driver transformation she undergoes in the closing stages. The descriptions of the river, the city with its fantastic buildings and ugly mean streets, it’s palaces, graveyards, quiet market squares, and opium dens are beautiful. The whole of this dark world is lit by lanterns. Even the fish glow with light, and it really is quite lovely. But because I found the book so unbalanced, the characters from the daylight world so excruciatingly awful with a female lead who needed somebody to wrap her golden plaits round her neck and strangle her with them, the whole plot so full of holes it’s astonishing the entire cast didn’t just disappear, I won’t.

I’d recommend it for Koyee Mai’s story and a dip into her world which is the greater part of the book. Moth seems to be permafree so all it costs is your time. It’s the first of a long series, which I shall not be reading. Unfortunately, the awful Bailey is not eliminated in the terrible battles at the end of the book, so will no doubt be wiggling her plaits, shoving her finger into people’s chests and bullying and demeaning her so-called friends all the way through the series.

Amazon.com

Amazon.co.uk

Published by

Jane Dougherty

I used to do lots of things I didn't much enjoy. Now I am officially a writer. It's what I always wanted to be.

20 thoughts on “A curate’s egg of a book”

      1. I can understand that. I enjoyed the Japanesey parts though. Such a shame the writer had to water down the effect with cardboard comic strip characters.

  1. Gosh Jane, you have terrified me with that review! I didn’t know you were capable of it! Lol! I really quite enjoyed it. .. Guess that makes me as savage as you. The Japanese style world might be quite nice, but I think I’ll pass. It’s the characters which attract me to the story, not the world building, no matter how good. As has already been pointed out, too many other books waiting to be read. I’m glad I’m not Daniel Arenson right now! Hehe!

      1. Annoying that he can write such rubbish and do well out of it. Maybe that’s where we’re going wrong.

      2. I wouldn’t say it’s rubbish, just that some aspects of it are awful. Some adults like reading very juvenile books. They’re easy and don’t require much effort. I hate books with supposedly adult (Bailey is 19) characters who behave like irritating small children. Some adults don’t notice the difference. Some people believe the world is flat and it was created in 4000 BC. Takes all sorts.

      3. Oh… Wasn’t it? Now you’ve totally shattered my illusions. Some people still believe the earth is flat. Did you see the post on the flat earth theory on Sacha’s blog a few weeks ago?

      4. Yes, and it didn’t surprise me at all. I often see arguments on twitter between atheists and fundamentalists and the things these people come out with are mind-boggling. One of the things that really gets them going is evolution (obviously) and Noah’s ark. You might be interested to know that the dinosaurs were on the ark, it’s the dating of the fossils that’s up the creek by about 30 million years. Because the earth was created about 6000 years ago, right?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s