Poetry break. My back hurts. A ‘free’ quadrille for dverse
Freedom is not an absolute,
merely one form of shackles broken,
all the rest remain.
You can hoist your flags,
sing your patriotic songs
and dance in the streets,
but hungry children still cry,
and love still holds your heart
in its unrelenting grip.
Sorry about your back, Jane. This is lovely. And so true.
Thanks De. The back is protesting at the box packing, that’s all. I hope it will be ready to go another round tomorrow. Removal day looms and I am so stressed out it’s not true.
The bonds we choose and those we don’t.
There is an end to the endlessness of moving. Really. (K)
When the machine runs out of steam. I hope we land somewhere we love before that happens.
Yes.
If one of us is not free can we ever be?
Freedom is a word that means everything and nothing. I usually means freedom for me to do what I like.
I suppose the shackles of love are ones we do not want to break.
In the best of worlds, no. When the bond feels like shackles, then maybe we do.
Word. Powerful last line and thanks for calling out all that creepy nationalism,
To be perfectly honest, I hadn’t even thought of 9/11. It’s just one of so many tragedies. But you’re right, it was a terrible loss of life and there were lots of individual acts of heroism as there always are when any people are faced with the choice. Dwelling on words like heroism and nobility and self-sacrifice takes individual grieving away from those who lost someone close and turns it into a sort of Wagnerian drama. There’s nothing pro or anti freedom in these tragedies, just insanity and deep sadness.
I didn’t think this was about 9/11. All countries are capable of creepy nationalism.
Okay. I’d forgotten about the anniversary. It was when I looked on twitter and saw the hundreds of thousands of tweets about it, I realised that a lot of people are still deeply involved with it.
9/11 to me first and foremost is my wedding anniversary.
A much happier thought.
Not all Americans fetishize that date.
We only ever hear from the vociferous minority.
So true, Jane. I agree with nostaintaugustine about the creepy nationalism.
Hope your back feels after the rest. 🙂
Thanks Merril. The back is fully restored after a knock out pill last night and I’m going easy on the last boxes.
I didn’t write a poem about 9/11, and the date passed me by altogether, I’m afraid. But the notion of ‘freedom’ is so ambivalent. The freedom to travel to foreign places is the destruction of someone else’s freedom to live in unspoilt surroundings. To have an excess of cheap meat means appalling conditions for billions of animals. The freedom to buy cheap clothes takes away the freedom of millions of children to have a childhood. Shouting for ‘freedom’ is never what it seems at face value. And women aren’t usually included in the population being freed.
I’m glad you’re back is feeling better, and yes, you are right about freedom.
Thank you 🙂 Sometimes a painkiller loosens up the knot. It worked this time.
Well, hoisting a flag will certainly do nothing for your back. Great poem. Hope you recover quickly.
Thanks! Back’s had a rest and is ready for more. I don’t even possess a flag and don’t have any use for one—except at football matches 🙂
Agreed!
🙂
Oh my, yes! I couldn’t agree more. There is no real freedom— yet. Not when thousands are still oppressed.
Exactly. Economic freedom for one, inevitably means slavery for someone else. And as long as we continue to identify with our own ‘tribe’ to the detriment of every other living thing on the planet, all we’ll end up with is a deeper and deeper gulf of inequality and injustice.
Dang! And I thought real love was a freeing object (as per the song Sting recorded in penance for “I’ll Be Watching You.”) Free from the bonds of love, or freed to love? Hmmm.
No one is free, if freedom equates with self-interest. We are all interdependent and our freedom to do any ridiculous thing we want inevitably has consequences for other people. Love isn’t a freedom either. If you love, you’re stuck with the object, however much the object neglects you.
I haven’t replied for two reasons. One: I’ve been doing storm clean-up. Two: I haven’t an answer to your definition of love. I learned long ago that whatever one feels is reality; don’t negate it by saying, “Oh, you don’t mean that! Oh, you don’t feel that!” You do or you wouldn’t have written it. I have encountered many people (mostly married women, and mostly in what was then my office/study) for whom this was utter reality. Unfortunately, I found the root of the problem for most of them was that they had married a man. Too many men are “happily” disconnected from all positive emotion and all emotionally healthy response. I’m not saying that that’s the case for you. I don’t know how you came to your definition. But I will tell you that it doesn’t fit my reality. As far as I can tell, my wife doesn’t feel that way either. Love is a verb; not a noun. It’s not a thing people fall into… that would be manure. 🙂
I’m not sure what definition of love you’re referring to. I was trying to say that love isn’t automatically a freeing experience. It creates emotional ties that can’t really be called freedom. I was thinking of the love we have for our children that means we are bound to them, worry about them, feel pain for them even when they feel that they have spread their wings and flown to experience their idea of freedom, and don’t think about their parents more often than strictly necessary.
Hope your storm damage wasn’t too catastrophic.
We came away fairly unscathed.
Now I get what you were saying! Children are a whole ‘nother matter (yes, I know that isn’t proper English… nor American). Children are like many cats and some dogs. You are not left feeling you are investing emotions so much as you are throwing them down a deep well. (And not all children, obviously.)
I think we’re on the same wavelength. Children soak up everything that’s thrown at them for better or worse, but they don’t necessarily feel under any obligation to return some of the affection and attention. Then they become parents and wonder why their own children always have a previous engagement when their help would be appreciated.
The ultimate song about what you just said!
So true!
I like your view. It is true. On this earth we will never be completely free . But it still must be our aim.
The more I think about it, the less I understand what the word means. What is freedom? No one can do what they want, unless they have pots of money—that usually gets rid of most obstacles—but they can’t command respect or love or admiration. And when you can buy what you want, those things must acquire a huge importance.
Freedom seems to always come with a price.
And not just for the individual searching for freedom. Even a little freedom, like the freedom to eat avocados all year round had a huge impact on the planet, and none of it good;
Freedom on the back of others leave a sour aftertaste (or a sore back)
I blame the boxes, but I know what you mean. And I can’t think of a ‘freedom’ that doesn’t come with an ‘unfreedom’ for someone else.
A new kind of Kit-Kat, and I’m sorry about your back, Jane. I agree with Truedessa, freedom does seem to always come with a price – a leitmotif of mankind’s history. I wonder what it would have been like if women had always been in charge.
The back’s just protesting. I’ve promised to take it easy today. I can’t see how women could ever have stayed in charge. All it needs is one over-muscled, over-testosteroned bloodthirsty warrior type to get the boys stirred up, and the disease would spread like wildfire.
It;s a nice thought though…
If only…
We keep hearing about freedom of speech, freedom of expression , freedom to do exactly as we please ; it’s the in thing and yet total freedom means total anarchy. Fortunately we have a partly moral nature which will never let us be totally free to please ourselves in every way.
Exactly. Freedom for one is slavery for another. Who is ever free from all worries anyway?
“but hungry children still cry…” It’s what we do with the freedom…
And that will depend on our moral make up , we might believe it is wrong to enjoy ourselves when we could be devoting our time to others.
I’m still unsure what freedom really means. We see protests and rebellions and revolutions, coups d’état, independence movements, and when those who shouted for freedom from the oppressor have got what they wanted, when the celebrations are over and the dead have been buried, the men go back to laying down the law at home, and the women do exactly what they’ve been doing for centuries—comforting hungry children and picking up the pieces.
Reblogged this on Die Erste Eslarner Zeitung – Aus und über Eslarn, sowie die bayerisch-tschechische Region!.
🙂
There is much truth in this. I think we have to look at our perception of freedom.
So do I. It’s a word that’s bandied about as a panacea to problems that need more than just a change of flag/partner/job to make them go away.